小产权房558_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院在执行案件，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产往往是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重要的执行对象。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权按_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>我国的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>规_blank class=infotextkey>定属_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记物权，是以取得_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>证明—_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产证为其所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权的标志，即该物权的设立、变更、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>终止须经_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>才能产生相应的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律_blank class=infotextkey>效力。在司法实践_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中，对_blank class=infotextkey>原属被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>却因_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“恶意串通、逃避_blank class=infotextkey>债务_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”等无
_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院在执行案件，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产往往是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重要的执行对象。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权按_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>我国的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>规_blank class=infotextkey>定属_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记物权，是以取得_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>证明—_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产证为其所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权的标志，即该物权的设立、变更、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>终止须经_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>才能产生相应的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律_blank class=infotextkey>效力。在司法实践_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中，对_blank class=infotextkey>原属被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>却因_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“恶意串通、逃避_blank class=infotextkey>债务_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”等无效乃至_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>违法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为，并已经_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记在_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第三_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>名_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>下的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”能否执行?_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>目前，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法规对此无_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>明确的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>规_blank class=infotextkey>定，执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人员在_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>具_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>体_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>操作_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>比较_blank class=infotextkey>困难。笔者想就此类_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房的执行作些探讨。
对此类_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房执_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>障碍来自于两个_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>方_blank class=infotextkey>面：_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第一、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>如何_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>处理好行_blank class=infotextkey>政_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>避让;_blank class=infotextkey>第二，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院执行机构_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有无确认此类民事_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“无效_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”的权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>限和职能。
首先_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>必须强调的是，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>政府_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>监管_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>部门颁发_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权证的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>一种_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>十分严肃的行_blank class=infotextkey>政_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为，其_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为非经行_blank class=infotextkey>政审判_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>程序，任何_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>其他_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>机关均无权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>改变其行_blank class=infotextkey>政_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有效性，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不能_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>撤销或宣_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>布无效。这_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>就是行_blank class=infotextkey>政、司法各司其职、相互_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>尊_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重、互_blank class=infotextkey>不越权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>处理事务的行_blank class=infotextkey>政_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>避让_blank class=infotextkey>原则。因此，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>及其执行机构对_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉及到_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权归属的认_blank class=infotextkey>定，应持_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>十分_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>慎_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重的态度。
_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>同_blank class=infotextkey>时，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>我们也_blank class=infotextkey>应该看到，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>目前执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>工作_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中，被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人转移财产的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>情况_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>相当_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>严_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重，其_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中也包括转移_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不动产_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房。_blank class=infotextkey>如果_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>发现被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人与_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第三_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人串通转移_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产并变更_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记证照的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>情况，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院执行机构如_blank class=infotextkey>不采取_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有效措施加以遏止，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>那么这种_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>情况就_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>会加速蔓延，极易使被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人钻_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律空_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>子，与_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第三_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人勾结损害债权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>利益，而执行_blank class=infotextkey>制度_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>保护_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>权利的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>重点在于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>保护债权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>利益，因此，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律应赋予执行机构对此类_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>处理的职能和权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>限。
从法理_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上来看，执行机构对此类_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>可以_blank class=infotextkey>依法执行，理由如_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>下：
_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第一，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>我国_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>目前尚_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>没_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有一_blank class=infotextkey>部完整_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系统的物权法，_blank class=infotextkey>法学_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>专家对物权的论著很_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>多，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>争议也较_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>大，但对_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记证的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律属性而言，其_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>观点均是一致的。那_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>就是：从_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为的本_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身性质看，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为只是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>一种行_blank class=infotextkey>政_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为，它仅起到物权的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>公示作用，并_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不能承担衡量或_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>决_blank class=infotextkey>定_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>买卖、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>转让是否_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有效的职能。
_blank class=infotextkey>第二、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权证照_blank class=infotextkey>不等同于所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>最_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>高_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院《_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关于贯彻执行民事_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>政策_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律若干_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>问题的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>意见》_blank class=infotextkey>第56条_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>规_blank class=infotextkey>定，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>买卖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>双方自愿，并立_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有契约、买方已交付了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款，岗厦村统建_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>楼.fan_blank class=infotextkey>g558.com/esf/ tar_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>二手_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房，并实际_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>使用和_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>管理了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋，_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>又_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>没_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>其他_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>违法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为，只是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>买卖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>手续_blank class=infotextkey>不完善的，应认为_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>买卖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有效，但应让其补办_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房屋_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>买卖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>手续_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”。这一_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>解释是对_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>传统的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不动产所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记要式_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>理论的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>突破，它说明了：_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>没_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有取得_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权证的并_blank class=infotextkey>不等于其_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>没_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有该_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产的所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权，绿本_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产证是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>什么性质，持_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权证的也_blank class=infotextkey>不等于拥_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房产的所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>那么因案外_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人与被执行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“恶意串通,转移财产_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>“隐瞒事实_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>”等无效乃至_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>违法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>行为，并已_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>登记在_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第三_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>名_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>下的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房，更_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不能因其持_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权证而得认其所_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>得到_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法律的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>认可和_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>保护。
